Dolby atmos 5.1.2 speaker placement plus#
Dolby atmos 5.1.2 speaker placement professional#

YouвЂ™ll be able to track the sound like never before. It means youвЂ™ll be experiencing a much more immersive soundscape that flows smoothly around you from all angles. Instead, each sound is recognised as an individual entity called an audio object, which can be precisely pinpointed anywhere in the 3D space around you, including from above. In a Dolby Atmos setup, filmmakers can now finally have complete freedom as sound is no longer tied to channels. Typically, dialogue will come out of centre channels, music out of left and right, sound effects out of the surround sound speakers and low frequencies out of the subwoofer. This surround sound tech allows filmmakers to direct sounds to specific channels and therefore specific speakers.

Dolby atmos 5.1.2 speaker placement plus#

To understand Dolby Atmos, letвЂ™s begin with its predecessor вЂ“ Dolby Digital surround sound.Д«y now, youвЂ™re probably rocking or at least familiar with a surround sound setup like 5.1 (5 speakers plus subwoofer) or 7.1 (7 speakers plus subwoofer). Your ears are in for an absolute treatвЂ¦ What is Dolby Atmos? HereвЂ™s everything you need to know about Dolby Atmos and how you can set up your own Dolby Atmos home theatre. ItвЂ™s been ushered into major cinemas and heading straight for your home theatre. What was once hailed as the future of cinematic sound is fast becoming mainstream. The kind of bang that puts you in the thick of the action.Дolby Atmos. If you want atmos, stick to in/on-ceiling speakers, and only settle for X.1.4 unless you have a very small room and just feel the need to see the atmos/DS-upmix logos light up.Start the new year with a bang. TL DR: Avoid reflected-speaker solutions, sticking to traditional base channels instead (5./6.1/7.1). However, in my experience, for smaller rooms (less than ~11'x11') where seats are against/near the back wall and large atmos-speaker/listening angles yield very short distances from each other on the ceiling, a 5.1.2 system MIGHT work.but I think in that case switching to high-mounted dipoles sides in a 5.1 system would give much the same effect. It wasn't bad.but it didn't add enough to the experience to warrant the $100's/$1,000's required for the upgrade. X.1.2 by comparison didn't offer much that wasn't already accomplished by previous DSP's: Dolby PLIIz, Yamaha Presence, or Audyssey DSX. I use on-ceiling speakers in my dedicated theater and living room, and tried every combination possible, and found X.1.4 as the only option worth the cost/effort. Regarding 'real' atmos (in/on-ceiling).it depends on the room and equipment. If you're itching to add channels, I think adding 'wide' DSP-derived channels would better serve 90% of rooms more so than any amount of reflected-based 'height' channels. I actually found this to be a better solution than dedicated off-the-shelf solutions, because you can adjust the rake for proper angle given the geometry of the subtended angle formed by you front speakers and your listening position. If you want to get a good idea how these atmos-ready speakers sounds, get small bookshelf speakers and prop them up at angle on your mains (try to aim for the point on the ceiling that will 'bounce' directly to your seat, a-la billiards).

Dolby atmos 5.1.2 speaker placement professional#

Your money is much better spent on professional calibrations (if you do not have the necessary equipment and understanding of acoustics to do so yourself), multiple subwoofers, better subwoofers, and proper acoustic treatments. Even the best designs suffer from a multitude of acoustical problems, and require very specific room construction to be even somewhat effective. simulated by reflection) systems, whether they be X.1.2 or X.1.4, to be ineffective and a waste of money at best, or gimmicky and distracting at worst. Also, I do not receive any monetary compensation for the advertisement or sale of consumer electronics. Disclaimer: As with all audio experiences, this is purely subjective, and dependent upon individual equipment, room, HRTF, and, most importantly, bias/prejudices.